The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) adopts new §78.14 concerning acupuncture.New §78.14 is adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the July 20, 2018, issue of the Texas Register (43 TexReg 4817).
This new rule with changes is adopted under Texas Occupations Code §201.152, which authorizes the Board to adopt rules necessary to perform the Board’s duties and to regulate the practice of chiropractic.
No other statute, article, or rule is affected by this rule.
The Board adopts the new §78.14 (with non-substantive changes made to the proposed version)to replace the Board’s previous acupuncture rule in order to promote a clearer understanding of the requirements for the practice of acupuncture as performed by doctors of chiropractic. The rule also delineates the differences between the way chiropractors practice acupuncture and the way that of other Texas health professions do. The new rule clarifies the degree of regulatory oversight the Board exercises over the practice of acupuncture to safeguard the public while not imposing unnecessary economic burdens on either chiropractors who offer the acupuncture modality or on consumers.
The thirty-day comment period ended on August 20, 2018.
The Board received numerous comments regarding the proposed new rule, including from theTexas Chiropractic Association (TCA), the Texas Medical Association (TMA), the Texas Association of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (TAAOM), and eighty-seven individuals.
Comment: TCA urged the adoption of the proposed rule in its current form, but recommended the Board not adopt the proposed 200 hours of training in the use and administration of acupuncture in order for a chiropractor to receive a permit. TCA reiterated its position that increasing the training requirement from the current 100 hours is unnecessary to protect the public. Numerous other commenters also pointedly raised this issue. TCA further noted that it is inconsistent and arbitrary to impose this heightened regulatory burden on chiropractors when medical doctors, dentists, and physical therapists perform acupuncture with far less training.
Response: The Board agrees with TCA and the other commenters that the proposed increase in required training from 100 to 200 hours would impose an unnecessary economic and regulatory burden on chiropractors and students currently enrolled at chiropractic colleges without increasing public safety in any significant way. The Board notes that no evidence has been produced that the currently required 100 hours of training in acupuncture is inadequate to protect the public. The Board acknowledges that the increase in required hours could be seen as an economic barrier to market entry for newly licensed chiropractors, especially in light of the fact that other licensed health professionals are permitted to practice acupuncture with far fewer hours of training. The Board, therefore, has reduced the number of required hours from 200 to the existing 100.
Comment: Two commenters raised concerns about the proposed rule’s permission to use the terms “Board Certified,” “Board Certified in Chiropractic Acupuncture,” and “Board Certified in Acupuncture as an adjunctive modality by the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners” in advertising by chiropractors. The concerns were the terms were confusing and too lengthy.
Response: The Board agrees in part and has modified the rule’s language. The Board has kept the language allowing a chiropractor to use the terms “Board Certified” and “Board Certified in Chiropractic Acupuncture” if used in conjunction with the name of the nationally recognized certifying board and the specific credentials granted. The Board concurs that the advertising term “Board Certified in Acupuncture as an adjunctive modality by the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners” is too lengthy and may give the impression that the Board is acting as an accredited certifying board. Therefore, the Board has changed the term “certificate” to”permit” throughout the rule to make it clear that the Board is acknowledging a chiropractor’s qualifications.
The Board has also eliminated the provision in the proposed rule that required the Board to issue a separate document to permit a chiropractor to practice acupuncture; the Board will instead include the permitting language on each renewal license issued to chiropractors who meet the rule’s requirements.
Comment: Several individuals submitted comments urging the Board to include the practice of dry needling in this rule.
Response: The Board appreciates the comments but declines to address this issue as it is outside the bounds of this rule.
Comment: The Board received several comments from chiropractors who found the proposed rule’s language confusing regarding the requirements for obtaining a permit to practice acupuncture, especially for those who have been successfully practicing acupuncture in Texas under the Board’s current rule for several years.
Response: The Board agrees with the commenters that the language regarding the requirements for obtaining a permit in the proposed rule was unclear. The Board has changed what is now subsection (e) to be more precise.
The Board removed the requirement to provide patient records as proof of having practiced for at least ten years and substituted it with providing a written statement of having practiced acupuncture in a clinical setting, with the statement subject to Board verification. The Board believes the original requirement of providing redacted patient records, which could go back several years, was too onerous on chiropractors.
Comment: Several individuals said the continuing education provision in the proposed rule that required eight hours of acupuncture education for each two years of licensure was not clear.
Response: The Board agrees and has modified the language in what is now subsection (f) to state that a chiropractor permitted to practice acupuncture must complete a minimum of eight hours in Board-approved acupuncture courses every biennium.
Comment: One individual questioned why the rule’s training requirements for acupuncture only allow for didactic, clinical, and practical training, but exclude online and distance learning options.
Response: The Board appreciates the comment, but declines to include those training methods at this time.
Comment: TMA expressed its strong opposition to the proposed rule on the grounds the Board lacks the legal authority to regulate the practice of acupuncture by chiropractors. TMA made no direct comments on the language of the proposed rule itself.
Response: The Board disagrees with TMA’s position. Acupuncture or filiform needles used in the practice of acupuncture are non-incisive, meaning those needles do not cut or leave a wound when properly used. Texas courts have found that the Board’s position is not unreasonable or inconsistent with Texas Occupations Code Chapter 201. Because the use of acupuncture or filiform needles is non-incisive, their use falls within the chiropractic scope of practice, and thus the Board has statutory authority to enact rules regulating that use.
Comment: Numerous licensed acupuncturists wrote to object to the proposed rule on nearly identical grounds, including objections that the Board lacks the legal authority to promulgate the rule, that the rule potentially endangers the public, and that the rule has the potential to cause economic harm to licensed acupuncturists. These individuals made no direct comments on the language of the proposed rule itself.
Response: Regarding the objections concerning the Board’s legal authority to promulgate the proposed rule, the Board disagrees and notes its response to similar comments by TMA above.
The Board disagrees that the public would somehow be at risk from the continued practice of acupuncture by chiropractors because of a lack of training. The Board again notes there is no empirical evidence that any person in Texas has been harmed by a chiropractor practicing acupuncture under either the Board’s current rule, which requires 100 hours of training in acupuncture beyond the extensive training in physiology and anatomy all chiropractors receive in their four-year chiropractic college degree programs, or in the several decades before the current rule’s adoption. This argument is further undercut by the fact that other Texas health professionals are permitted to practice acupuncture with far fewer hours of additional training or experience.
The Board also disagrees with the argument that allowing chiropractors to practice acupuncture would economically harm acupuncturists. Chiropractors and acupuncturists have both practiced acupuncture, albeit with differing philosophies, for several decades in Texas. the existing were safely practicing acupuncture in Texas long before the enactment of Texas Occupations Code Chapter 205. There is no evidence that acupuncturists have suffered been produced harm up to now, nor is there any to show there will be any future harm. The Board takes seriously its oversight mandate to protect the public health without imposing unnecessary economic costs on either chiropractors or consumers.
Comment: TAAOM submitted lengthy comments to the Board regarding the proposed rule.
Response: The Board disagrees with TAAOM’s assertion that the Board has no authority to define acupuncture or to authorize the practice of acupuncture by its licensees. The Board does have such statutory authority. As noted above in the Board’s response to TMA, acupuncture or filiform needles used in the practice of acupuncture are non-incisive, and thus within the scope of practice under Texas Occupations Code Chapter 201.
The Board declines to respond to TAAOM’s comments concerning dry needling as that is outside the bounds of this rulemaking.
The Board agrees, in part, with TAAOM that the use of the term “board certification” could cause confusion. The rule has been changed to state that a chiropractor who meets the rule’s requirements for the practice of acupuncture will be granted a permit to perform acupuncture as opposed to a certificate, so as not to give the impression that the chiropractor has been credentialed by the Board.
The Board disagrees with TAAOM’s claim that the hours of training in acupuncture chiropractors receive are inadequate to protect the public. Doctors of chiropractic on average receive over 4200 hours of doctoral-level training that focuses on anatomy and physiology, which far exceeds the training an undergraduate-level acupuncturist receives. It is, therefore, incorrect to suggest that a chiropractor trained in acupuncture has a lesser understanding of physiological mechanics than does an acupuncturist.
The Board disagrees with TAAOM’s insistence the Board increase the verification requirements for chiropractors who began practicing acupuncture before 2010 and have always done so safely before the Board may grant them permits. Because it lacks a legitimate public health rationale, TAAOM’s position would only add unnecessary and burdensome economic costs on chiropractors. The Board believes the documentation the new rule requires of chiropractors who began practicing acupuncture before 2010 is more than sufficient to protect the public health.
The Board disagrees with TAAOM’s position that a chiropractor who practices acupuncture should be prevented from advertising that fact. The practice of acupuncture is within a chiropractor’s scope of practice. To deny a chiropractor the ability to advertise without a legitimate public safety rationale, as TAAOM urges the Board to do, is nothing more than the restriction of the economic freedom and commercial free speech rights of one profession for the benefit of another. The Board declines to impose such a limit.
The Board agrees with TAAOM that unnecessary references to other Board rules should be removed. Those references have been removed.
Chiropractic care is an alternative treatment option which utilizes a variety of methods and techniques to treat injuries and/or conditions. As mentioned in the article, when it comes to the use of acupuncture in chiropractic care, the final ruling is that chiropractors, or doctors of chiropractic, are allowed to practice acupuncture.Dr. Alex Jimenez D.C., C.C.S.T. Insight
(a) Acupuncture, and the related practices of acupressure and meridian therapy, includes methods for diagnosing and treating a patient by stimulating specific points on or within the musculoskeletal system by various means, including manipulation, heat, cold, pressure,vibration, laser, ultrasound, light electro current, and the insertion of acupuncture needles or solid filiform needles for the purpose of obtaining a bio-positive reflex response by nerve stimulation.
(b) A licensee shall practice acupuncture only after obtaining a permit from the Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board).
(c) The Board shall place on each renewal license to practice chiropractic a statement that a licensee who has met all Board requirements is permitted to practice acupuncture. A licensee whose license does not contain the statement permitting the practice of acupuncture shall not practice or advertise the practice of acupuncture.
(d) A licensee with an acupuncture permit cannot delegate the performance of acupuncture.
(e) Requirements for an acupuncture permit:
(1) On or after the effective date of this rule, a licensee may receive an acupuncture permit from the Board by completing at least one hundred (100) hours of training in acupuncture and passing the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners’ examination. The training must be provided by an accredited chiropractic college, or post-secondary university, or other educational or testing institution approved by the Board. Such training shall include didactic, clinical, and practical training in the practice of acupuncture, clean needle techniques, examination, and protocols that meet the blood-borne pathogen standard established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
(2) A person who became a licensee after January 1, 2010, and before the effective date of this rule, who has been practicing acupuncture in compliance with previous Board rules, shall have until September 1, 2019, to obtain an acupuncture permit from the Board by passing the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners’ standardized certification examination in acupuncture and completing 100 hours of acupuncture training.
(3) A person who became a licensee before January 1, 2010, shall have until September 1, 2019, to obtain an acupuncture permit from the Board by having:
(A) Successfully completed and passed an examination in a one hundred (100) hour training course in acupuncture; or
(B) Successfully completed and passed either the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners’standardized certification examination in acupuncture or the examination offered by the National Certification Commission of Acupuncture before the effective date of this rule; or
(C) Successfully completed formal training along with providing a statement to the Board of having practiced acupuncture in clinical practice for at least ten years before January 1, 2010, and is in good standing with the Board and the regulatory entities of the other jurisdictions in which the licensee is licensed. The Board may audit any statement for accuracy.
(4) Documentation of acupuncture training shall be in the form of signed certificates of attendance or completion, or diplomas from course sponsors or instructors.
(f) A licensee permitted to practice acupuncture must complete a minimum of eight (8) hours in Board-approved acupuncture courses every biennium.
(g) A licensee shall not practice acupuncture until the licensee has submitted proof of compliance with subsection (e) and has received a permit from the Board.
(h) A licensee practicing acupuncture shall not advertise in a manner that suggests the licensee possesses a license to practice acupuncture issued by the Texas State Board of AcupunctureExaminers, including using any of the terms “acupuncturist,” “licensed acupuncturist,” “L.Ac.,” “Traditional Chinese Medicine,” or “degreed in acupuncture.”
(i) A licensee’s advertising may include the terms “Board Certified” or “Board Certified in Chiropractic Acupuncture” if it also clearly identifies the nationally recognized certifying board and credentials.
(j) Approved programs in clinical acupuncture or meridian therapy offered by accredited chiropractic colleges or universities are designed for doctors of chiropractic and other disciplines. These courses are not intended as a substitute for a full curriculum teaching traditional Chinese medicine; rather they focus on the principle, theory, scientific findings, and practical modern application of acupuncture as currently practiced by doctors of chiropractic.
(k) The practice of acupuncture by a licensee who has not complied with the requirements of this section constitutes unprofessional conduct and subjects the licensee to disciplinary action. A licensee who advertises acupuncture without first obtaining a permit also has engaged in unprofessional conduct.
The scope of our information is limited to chiropractic as well as to spinal injuries and conditions. To discuss the subject matter, please feel free to ask Dr. Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900 .
Curated by Dr. Alex Jimenez
Back pain is one of the most prevalent causes of disability and missed days at work worldwide. Back pain is the second most common reason for doctor office visits, outnumbered only by upper-respiratory infections. Approximately 80 percent of the population will experience back pain at least once throughout their life. The spine is a complex structure made up of bones, joints, ligaments, and muscles, among other soft tissues. Because of this, injuries and/or aggravated conditions, such as herniated discs, can eventually lead to symptoms of back pain. Sports injuries or automobile accident injuries are often the most frequent cause of back pain, however, sometimes the simplest of movements can have painful results. Fortunately, alternative treatment options, such as chiropractic care, can help ease back pain through the use of spinal adjustments and manual manipulations, ultimately improving pain relief.
The information herein on "Chiropractors and Acupuncture" is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional, licensed physician, and is not medical advice. We encourage you to make your own health care decisions based on your research and partnership with a qualified health care professional.
Our information scope is limited to chiropractic, musculoskeletal, physical medicines, wellness, sensitive health issues, functional medicine articles, topics, and discussions. We provide and present clinical collaboration with specialists from a wide array of disciplines. Each specialist is governed by their professional scope of practice and their jurisdiction of licensure. We use functional health & wellness protocols to treat and support care for the injuries or disorders of the musculoskeletal system.
Our videos, posts, topics, subjects, and insights cover clinical matters, issues, and topics that relate to and support, directly or indirectly, our clinical scope of practice.*
Our office has made a reasonable attempt to provide supportive citations and has identified the relevant research study or studies supporting our posts. We provide copies of supporting research studies available to regulatory boards and the public upon request.
We understand that we cover matters that require an additional explanation of how it may assist in a particular care plan or treatment protocol; therefore, to further discuss the subject matter above, please feel free to ask Dr. Alex Jimenez or contact us at 915-850-0900.
We are here to help you and your family.
Chiropractic medicine is used as a standard musculoskeletal injury/strain treatment and for rehabilitation. Chiropractic helps… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFMxmI2PZoQ We want to welcome you to our newest functional Medicine presentation, where an expert… Read More
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kge4IJJ09tU Welcome to our new Functional Medicine presentation where an expert will be talking to… Read More
Personal Injury, Trauma & Spine Rehab. Specialists